Practice Report
(Vilniaus Žemynos gimnazija)
1. Basic arrangement
Members of practice group: Natalija Gerdevič, Ana Feofanova, Jolanta Gaidukevič, Darius Šlepikas, Mindaugas Lekavičius
Practice teacher and classes: Vida Vilieikienė, Audronė Sadonienė; 9A, 9B, 9C , 9D, 9E, 9F , 9G
Textbook and major aids: Solutions Intermediate Student's Book Author: Falla, T & Davies, P A;
Publisher: Oxford University Press; Publication Date: 2008 and. The all set include Solutions Intermediate (Student's Book, Workbook, Teacher's book, Audio, MultiROM)
Timetable and distribution of duties: I had 9 classes each week. Monday -3, Tuesday-1, Wednesday-2, Thursday-3, Friday-0.
I (Ana Feofanova) had 7/8 classes each week. I had classes every day, from Monday till Friday.
2. Classes
I had 3 groups of students: 9B, 9E, 9F . 9B and 9F were very strong groups and I hadn’t any problems with them, but 9E was a weak one, also in this class were only boys.
I (Ana Feofanova) had 3 groups of students: (9A, 9E and 9G). The strongest were the students from 9A. They worked hard and did their best during the whole period I was working with them. The situation was different with 9E where all the students were boys. Naturally, I did not managed to cope with them. 9G was the wickest class. The students worked a lot but it was difficult because we had to spend twice much time on the same material. On the whole describing the proficiency level so it was different, but the most suitable level defining my students was intermediate level.
Natalija Gerdevič had 3 groups of students : ( 9C , 9D and 9G). The proficiency level of three classes was rather different. The most motivated was 9C . I managed to make a contact with the children very quicky. Some of students had some problems with speaking tasks, so I tried to practice speakind skills as much a spossible. Moreover this class was quite motivated, they were almost all prepared for the lessons, so I had no troubles with them. Unfortunatelly, in 9D there were some boys who were absolutely not motivated. They ignored everything what I was saying or class was doing. It was hard to control them, but finaly, after long conversations after the lessons, I managed to change their behavior. At least they showed some respect to me. The weakest class was 9G. We shared this class between three of us, so it was difficult both of us: for students, to have 3 different teachers per week, and for us, to teach those children only once per week. These students were working hard, but they had many problems with grammar and speaking. The level of my students was intermediate.
3. Teaching
During the whole classes we used our own plans. We had to follow them. Every lesson started with the clear setting of aims, short introduction, practice time, setting and explaining homework. Each lesson was devided into particular stages. Generally, we followed the model of PPP (presentation/practice/production). Most often we worked from the student’s book and workbook and occasionally we used our own material.
Linguistic aims: teaching vocabulary, grammar, spelling, speaking, writing, listening, reading.
Approaches to this:
- teaching vocabulary – sketches, exercises, practice exercises, presentations, tests and quizes, dialogues, role plays;
- teaching grammar – presentation on the main rules, giving examples, practice exercises, homework, test, dictations;
- teaching spelling – listening to the recordings, production activities, dictations, practice exercises;
- teaching speaking – role plays, dialogues, texts, articles, group work, discussion, retelling the stories, short presentations, practice exercises;
- teaching writing – writing topics on a given theme, writing formal/informal letters, practice exercises;
- teaching listening – listening to the recordings, listening to the dialogues and variuos texts, listening for specific information, repetition, practice exercises;
- teaching reading – reading texts, reading for specific information, scan the text, true or false exercises, matching headlines.
All of us were quite successful during our teaching practice. Following the plan was really helpful to achieve all the aims. Talking about the teaching aims we achieved so, they were all different for each of us.
Ana Feofanova. In my opinion the most successful in my teaching was grammar, speaking and writing. Of course it depended on the classes I worked with. I liked the way I explained and presented the rules. I was quite clear and the result was obviuos after some test or exercises. Also, mentioning the speaking, it was extremely interesting to work with the students because they had many good ideas to share and present. I encouraged them to work in pairs in order to develop cooperative skills. The least achieved aims were listening and spelling because the students were not interesting in writing dictations and listening to the recording and recallin the information they heard.
Natalija Gerdevič. I thing the most successful in my teaching practice was speaking and writing. I noticed that my students liked the speaking tasks the most. We could discuus different issues, usually I asked many questions, to make students think, speak and share their experiences with the whole class. The students were very active( especially 9C ), they showed that they are interested in politics, future of our country, their health and education. The least achieved aims were listening, because sometimes I had to play the recording twice and the students could not understand what the text was about. I think that their listening skills are not developed enough due to rare listening practice during the lessons.
4. Coursebook assesment
All 9 grade students were using the Student’s book Solutions and the same workbook. The teaching aid is suitable for the students of intermediate level of English. This set provides a five-level general English course for 14-19 year-olds, who are preparing for the school-leaving exam. Solutions is quick to prepare and easy to use. Both teaching aids have a clear structure and step by step approach. A lot of attention is paid to speaking and writing. Also there are plenty of extra practice. The most interesting and useful thing is that every lesson has an outcome: the “I can” objective in each lesson gives students an immediate understanding of achievement.
In general almost all the students liked the material we coverd because the topics we touched upon were very modern and contemporary. This is the reason why almost all the learners were involved and worked hard.
5. Personal assessment
Natalija Grdevič. Although I had no problems with what to say or ask, I think I have to prove my pronunciation. Sometimes I made some mistakes while speaking with my students. Moreover, I have to think more about how to explain some grammar rules for students in an understandable and proficient language. I managed to control the class, but sometimes it was hard to stay calm in unexpected situations when the students were shouting and disturbing the lesson.
Ana Feofanova. In my opinion, on the whole I managed to teach quite well. Still there are some things that have to be improved. To my mind, I have to train my voice more. I have a lot of problems because of it. Sometimes even the students were making remarks to me and it was the most unpleasant thing. Although finally I got positive comments about my voice and that I made a huge progress but evidently I have to work on it more.
6. Advice on future practice organization.
Natalija Gerdevič, Ana Feofanova. To the mentor.
We want to advice our mentor to pay more attention to the students needs and interests. Of course it is important to work quickly and according to the textbook that the students have, hovewer, we noticed that some students need more explanation, more listening tasks, as they have some problems with it. We think that it would be useful for students to have some extra exercises from different sources. What is more, the students who have low speaking or writing abilities need more attention even after the lessons. The teacher should encourage them to work more, to explain some grammar rules if they need, to give some extra homework.
To the English Department.
We think that the English Department should change the amount of given tasks from different subjects during our practice. It is very hard to combine writing plans, searching for the material, preparing for the lessons and doing some extra tasks from the other subjects at the same time. We think that we had not enough explanation about our practice; consequently, we had some problems with the tasks and some unpleasant talks with the head of the school or the mentor. We were not enough informed about the procedure of feeling documents.